But it's also hamstrung by a lack of native lenses, along with Canon's baffling decision to keep its RF mount closed to third-party manufacturers. ![]() The EOS R7 is an excellent camera with superb autofocus – an area that the X-T5 may struggle to match it in – which makes it one of the best wildlife photography cameras around for its price. It's here that the Fujifilm X-T5 could potentially hold an advantage over one of its closest rivals, the Canon EOS R7. Viltrox, for example, recently launched an excellent XF13mm f/1.4 lens for astrophotography, while Sigma has kicked things off with three prime lenses of its own. And most importantly, the X-mount has now been opened up to allow third-party manufacturers to fill in some of the gaps, or offer cheaper alternatives to Fuji's own lenses. Still, some of the X-series' key primes – including the XF23mm f/1.4 R LM WR and XF33mm f/1.4 R LM WR – have now been updated. And, more importantly for the X-T5, the system still needs a lot more 'Mark II' lenses like the recent XF56mm f/1.2 R WR to really make the most of that 40MP resolution, even if Fuji claims (opens in new tab) that 20 existing lenses can extract the "maximum benefit" from its extra detail. The range of lenses available for the X-mount certainly isn't perfect – there's a gaping hole at the longer end for some telephoto primes like an XF300mm f/4, XF400mm f/4 or an XF500mm f/5.6. ![]() Sony continues to offer the best range of glass for full-frame cameras, and Fujifilm is now moving into pole position for APS-C cameras. ![]() The glass is greenerĬhoosing the right camera should always involve looking at the system's lenses to see if they're the best match for the things you like to shoot. But its trump card compared to its rivals will likely be the variety of high-quality glass that's available from Fujifilm and, increasingly, third-party brands. This mix of features wouldn't exactly make the Fujifilm X-T5 unique. All of these things should theoretically get the X-T5 in the ballpark of the X-T4's launch price of $1,699 / £1,549 / AU$2,999. Expect to see dual SD card slots, rather than the faster and pricier CFexpress, plus a smaller grip, an inferior electronic viewfinder (perhaps the 3.68-million dot one in the X-T4), limited video recording times, and no optional battery grip. The mid-range X-T5 will also definitely be less pro-leaning than the X-H2 in a few key areas. The X-T5 is expected to adopt Fujfilm's retro dials for changing settings like ISO and shutter speed, rather than the X-H2's 'PASM' (Program, Auto, Shutter, Manual) approach. So how will the X-T5 differ from the X-H2, which costs $1,999 / £1,899 / AU$3,399 (body-only)? It seems the main differences will be in the controls and the X-T5's slightly more amateur-leaning setup. That's good news we're finishing our testing of the X-H2 and (spoiler alert) it sets a new benchmark for APS-C sensors. According to Fuji Rumors (opens in new tab), this won't be the 'stacked' APS-C chip in the X-H2S, but rather the 40MP one that's inside the X-H2. (Image credit: Fujifilm)īut the X-T5 will likely bring big changes, including a new sensor. The Fujifilm X-H2 (above) delivered a new 40MP X-Trans 5 BSI APS-C sensor, which is rumored to be coming to the new X-T5.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |